As it has been a couple months since GhostShip first promised the new patch... it's best to assume they are not able to provide it. As any patch that is going to use TCP to check thousands of vital packets per second is bound to failure as it will slow down all traffic on the network to a halt.
Wanting to DDOS tor offline is anti-freespeech as millions of users behind the great firewall of China depend on it to access the internet behind their Government's restrictions. What kind of sick and twisted evil man would want to deny users free speech? Oh well put GhostShip on that list. He already deletes and edits posts he does not agree with on the WMW forum, why not move on to blocking entire countries as well? All he wants is to better his reign as WinMX dictator.
It's also unrealistic that GhostShip (Peter) would go to any court of law to get any kind of court order against an anonymity network that's virtually impossible to block. "Please judge, there are users who I do not agree with demonstrating free speech by advertising in our chat rooms. Please help our p2p network that is used by thousands of users to illegally share copyrighted files."
In fact I have no doubt that if GhostShip was ever pinpointed as the leader of the WinMX network by the RIAA or whoever, he would run and hide before ever stepping foot inside a legal court room. He already houses an illegal immigrant... why would he want to add copyright infringement along with aiding and abetting the illegal sharing of millions of dollars worth of material to the list?
Please just do us a favor GhostShip...
BWAHAHAH I'M YOUR PHARAOH NOW LOL
ReplyDeleteWhat a load of rubbish. Really you should get a life/
ReplyDeleteThat last one sounds like BeesKnees.
ReplyDeleteAnd notice this last commenter, who may be BeesKnees, hides behind a TOR-like proxy of anonymity, from which to launch his attacks.
Perhaps this is where the attackers learned such tactics - is it the stock and trade of WMW?
And to the writer of this blog... generally your english is pretty good, and while I'm pedantic enough to notice the little errors, I'm too lazy to bother pointing them out.
But when I see a glaring faux-pas such as where you typed "aiding and embedded", when you clearly meant aiding and *abetting*, I cannot ignore it, and neither should you.
I expect a prompt edit of this maladroit malapropism.
Thanks for pointing that out Knot. This post was made in a rush and the spell check sucks. It has been fixed.
ReplyDeleteWow this shit is getting old fast. Stick your dummy back in and be a good little baby.
ReplyDeleteI need facts! How is this proof of Ghostship doing these things, you say he is doing? For all I know you and a friend could have posted this bogus chat log. I don't use chat, so there would be no way to know if this chat log is real. Another thing, you weaken your case against GS, due to the fact, that you article is attacking him. You appear to have some sort of agenda of your own.
ReplyDelete